Claude and ChatGPT are brilliant chat interfaces. You open a tab, you ask, it answers. When you close the tab, the conversation ends. Tomorrow you open another tab and start again.
An AB does not work that way.
An AB has a job. The job has a start date and an end date that is usually "indefinitely". The AB shows up at 8am every weekday, picks up where it left off, follows up on the seventeen open threads it had yesterday, files what came in overnight, and pings a human when it hits something it cannot decide on its own.
That is a different shape of software. Same underlying models. Different product.
The honest comparison.
Claude or ChatGPT
A model with a chat interface. You drive. It answers what you ask, in the tab you opened, for as long as that tab is open. Stateless between sessions unless you paste in context yourself.
LeedAB
An operating system for ABs. Each AB has a role, a memory of your company, a calendar of recurring work, and the ability to act in your tools. ABs delegate to each other, run comms, and escalate to humans.
The shorter way to put it: A chatbot is a tool. An AB is an employee. Tools are useful when you remember to pick them up. Employees show up whether you remember or not.
What an AB actually does.
Pick a back-office task your team does by hand every week. Chasing suppliers for missing PODs. Reconciling expense reports against receipts. Onboarding a new hire across five SaaS tools. Following up with leads who never replied.
If you gave that task to Claude or ChatGPT, you would have to:
- Open the chat.
- Paste in the current state, every time.
- Tell it which tools to use.
- Copy the output back into your system.
- Remember to do it again tomorrow.
Yes, you can schedule a prompt now. A schedule is not a skilled AB. It runs the same prompt cold, with no memory of yesterday, no role, and no one to escalate to.
If you give that task to an AB, you onboard it once. After that, the AB plans its own work, reads the relevant inboxes and portals, pings the right humans, files what it produces, and learns from corrections. The "open a chat" step disappears.
Doesn't LeedAB use Claude and ChatGPT?
Yes. ABs reason on top of frontier models. Claude and GPT are two of the best ones today, and we use whichever is right for the job. We are not competing with the models. We are building the thing that runs around them: memory, identity, recurring schedules, tool access, delegation, comms, escalation, and a company brain that gets sharper the longer the AB is on the job.
If you imagine the model as the engine, LeedAB is the rest of the truck. The cabin, the steering, the GPS, the dispatcher who knows which roads to take, the maintenance log. Engines alone do not deliver freight.
When you should just use a chatbot.
We are not the right product for every job. Use Claude, ChatGPT, or any chat-shaped assistant when:
- You have a one-off question. "Rewrite this email." "Summarize this PDF."
- You are exploring, not operating. Brainstorming, drafting, learning.
- The work is finished when the answer comes back.
Use an AB when the work is ongoing, the state has to persist, and the cost of forgetting to do it is real money or a missed customer.
The bet.
Our bet is simple. The interesting next layer of AI software is not better chat. It is software that behaves like a colleague. Shows up, remembers, owns the outcome, asks for help when it should.
The companies winning the next five years will not have one extra ChatGPT seat per employee. They will have a handful of ABs running the boring spine of the operation, and the humans will have moved up the stack.
That is what we are building.
If you want to see an AB take over a back-office task you actually do by hand. Get access.